PARP Inhibitor Prolongs Progression-Free Survival in Ovarian Cancer

Olaparib as maintenance therapy produced highly significant reduction in disease progression

CHICAGO—The oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib delayed ovarian cancer recurrence by 4 months when given as maintenance therapy to patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, in an international study reported at the 2011 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology by Jonathan Ledermann, MD, professor of medical oncology, University College London, United Kingdom.

 

“Olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival by nearly 4 months on average, compared with placebo. This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer,” Ledermann said.

 

Olaparib targets DNA repair weakness in tumors by inhibiting base excision repair in a process known as homologous repair deficiency, which is observed in about 50% of women with ovarian cancer.

 

This study was an international phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled study of olaparib (400 mg twice daily) as maintenance therapy in 265 patients who had previously responded to at least 2 platinum-based regimens but had relapsed.

 

Disease progression occurred in 44% of the olaparib arm compared with 72% of the placebo arm; median progression-free survival was 8.4 months compared with 4.8 months, respectively. This translated into a 65% reduction in risk of progression that was highly significant (P <.00001).

 

“Our progression-free survival difference was very impressive and better than we anticipated,” Ledermann commented at a press briefing. At the time of analysis, 50% of patients receiving olaparib were still on-treatment, compared with only 16% of the placebo patients.

“Olaparib was well tolerated, and toxicities were consistent with those seen in previous studies,” he said, “although we saw an increase in 3 side effects with the drug.” These included nausea (68% vs 35%), fatigue (49% vs 38%), and vomiting (32% vs 14%).

 

Further studies will help determine the drug’s role in the routine treatment of ovarian cancer, he added.

Login or register to post comments

BEFORE YOU POST A COMMENT, please note that this is a site for oncology medical professionals. We encourage you to comment on articles posted on our site, but know that we do not edit or alter comments, and that our site is not gated. However, we do remove comments that contain profanity, personal attacks, advertisements for products, or other inappropriate material; we also remove comments that do not promote useful professional dialogue among members of our primary audience. Patients and members of the general public should note that neither the editors nor the authors of articles respond to questions about health matters; if you have such questions, you are advised to consult your healthcare provider.