Meaningful Response Possible with Third-Line Targeted Therapy Rechallenge for Patients with BRAF-Mutation–Positive Advanced Melanoma

Web Exclusives - Melanoma

In a poster presentation delivered at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program, investigators, led by Victoria Atkinson, MD, Medical Oncologist and Associate Investigator, Melanoma, Centre of Research Excellence for the Study of Naevi, Princess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, conclude from their study that “targeted therapy rechallenge should be considered a viable option for palliation in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma who have progressed on first- and second-line therapy.”

As third-line following first-line targeted therapy and second-line immunotherapy, rechallenge with third-line targeted therapy induced a response in 27%.

Patients with advanced melanoma who progress on first-line targeted therapy and second-line immunotherapy have limited treatment options. The researchers therefore explored the safety and efficacy of retreatment with third-line targeted therapy using data collected and pooled from 6 centers in Australia from 2009 to 2018. A total of 90 patients with BRAF V600-mutation–positive melanoma who had first-line therapy with a BRAF/MEK inhibitor, second-line immunotherapy, were rechallenged with a BRAF/MEK inhibitor. Approximately three-fourths (78%) had BRAF V600E-mutation–positive cancer, 14% had V600K, 6% had V600R, and 1% had V600M.

First-line targeted therapy was a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in 80%, predominantly dabrafenib (Tafinlar) plus trametinib (Mekinist). The response to first-line therapy was a complete response in 20%, partial response in 41%, stable disease in 17%, and progressive disease in 13%. Median duration of therapy was 7.2 months; 70% stopped for progressive disease, 9% for toxicity, and 16% had a planned switch to immunotherapy.

Second-line immunotherapy was a PD-1 inhibitor alone in 46%, a PD-1 inhibitor plus a CTLA-4 inhibitor in 33%, and a CTLA-4 inhibitor alone in 14%. Median duration on immunotherapy was 67 days; 81% ceased for progressive disease and 14% for toxicity. The best response to second-line immunotherapy was a complete response in 3%, a partial response in 10%, stable disease in 10%, and progressive disease in 70%.

Of the patients who had a planned switch to immunotherapy before progression on first-line targeted therapy, 1 patient had stable disease as best response to second-line immunotherapy.

At the time of targeted therapy rechallenge in the third line, 54% had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IVD disease, 34% had stage IVC, and 51% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase. As third line, 49% were rechallenged with dabrafenib plus trametinib, 33% with vemurafenib (Zelboraf) plus cobimetinib (Cotellic), and 11% with encorafenib (Braftovi) plus binimetinib (Mektovi).

The investigators surmised, “Rechallenge with targeted therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful palliation for this cohort of patients with a best objective response rate of 27% and little toxicity, although the duration of response was modest at a median of 81 days.”

 

Related Items
Novel LAG-3–Blocking Antibody plus Nivolumab Shows Promise as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Melanoma
William King
TON - October 2021 Vol 14, No 5 published on October 14, 2021 in Melanoma
Tebentafusp Improves Survival in Frontline Setting of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Patricia Stewart
TOP - September 2021 Vol 14, No 5 published on September 7, 2021 in Melanoma
Real-World Analysis Finds That Dabrafenib/Trametinib Combination Is Effective in Patients with BRAF V600-Mutated Melanoma with Brain Metastases
Web Exclusives published on December 14, 2020 in Melanoma
Effectiveness of Dual Immunotherapy Confirmed for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma and Autoimmune Disease
Web Exclusives published on December 14, 2020 in Melanoma
Symptoms from Immunotherapy/Targeted Therapy Most Mentioned Topic by Patients with Melanoma on Health-Related Social Media
Web Exclusives published on December 14, 2020 in Melanoma
Complete Responses Equally Durable with Shorter versus Longer Immunotherapy Courses in Advanced Melanoma
Web Exclusives published on December 14, 2020 in Melanoma
Combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Better Than Single-Agent Anti–PD-1 Regardless of BRAF Status in Advanced Melanoma
Web Exclusives published on December 14, 2020 in Melanoma
Immune-Related Adverse Events Occurring After 2 Years of Anti–PD-1 Therapy Are Common
Web Exclusives published on November 24, 2020 in Melanoma
CheckMate-238 Update: Nivolumab Improves 4-Year Relapse-Free Survival in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Web Exclusives published on November 24, 2020 in Melanoma
Dabrafenib plus Trametinib Confers Long-Term Relapse-Free Benefit in Stage III BRAF-Mutant Melanoma
Web Exclusives published on November 24, 2020 in Melanoma
Last modified: July 22, 2021