Stay Up to Date
Breaking News,
Updates, & More
Click Here to

Venetoclax Moves Forward in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TOP - February 2015, Vol 8, No 1 - Hematologic Cancers
Phoebe Starr

San Francisco, CA—The results of a phase 1b study of the combination of venetoclax plus rituximab (Rituxan) showed encouraging safety and excellent activity in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Venetoclax will move on to a phase 3 trial comparing venetoclax plus ri­tuximab versus bendamustine (Treanda) plus rituximab in patients with previously treated CLL. The drug is also being studied in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The study included 49 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who had a maximum of 3 previous myelosuppressive regimens and no previous transplant. The complete response (CR) rate was encouraging.

“Venetoclax plus rituximab is highly active in relapsed/refractory CLL, achieving an overall response rate of 88% and a complete response rate of 31%. The results suggest that rituximab adds to the efficacy of venetoclax,” said lead investigator Andrew W. Roberts, MBBS, PhD, Bone Marrow Transplant Physician and Clinical Hematologist, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

“Seventeen patients became minimal residual disease-negative on treatment, which is impressive bone marrow clearance,” Dr Roberts noted.

Venetoclax (formerly ABT-199/GDC-­0199) is an oral selective BCL-2 inhibitor that rapidly induces responses in approximately 80% of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL as a single agent. Venetoclax has synergy with rituximab in preclinical models of CD20-positive lymphoid malignancies. This study was undertaken to determine if the addition of rituximab would improve the efficacy of venetoclax.

The study was designed to identify a maximal tolerated dose of venetoclax and the optimal schedule for using the drug with rituximab and the safety of the combination, but remarkable bone marrow clearance was observed with this combination, said Dr Roberts.

Discontinuations were reported in 10 patients, 1 after the occurrence of tumor lysis syndrome, which led to adjustments in the schedule by modifying the dose of venetoclax and giving 1 dose of rituximab every 4 weeks. “The new schedule overcomes tumor lysis syndrome,” Dr Roberts said.

Venetoclax was generally well-tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal toxic­ity and grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression (47% neutropenia, 16% thrombocytopenia, and 14% anemia).

The overall response rate was 88%; 31% of patients achieved CR or CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 45% showed partial response (PR), and 12% showed unconfirmed PR.

“Good responses to the combination were observed in patients with del17p, known to have poor prognosis,” Dr Roberts said.

Overall, 9 of the 15 patients who achieved CR showed no minimal residual disease, and 1 patient with CR showed no minimal residual disease at 14 months. Of the patients with PR, 8 had no minimal residual disease. Of the 5 patients who achieved CR and discontinued therapy, none has progressed to date (up to 26 weeks).

Based on toxicity and efficacy data, 400 mg is the recommended dose. Slightly more neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicity, and dose reductions were observed at higher doses.

During the question and answer session, Dr Roberts was asked about biomarkers for venetoclax. He said that most patients with CLL express BCL2 and are sensitive to this drug, and, in his opinion, biomarkers for response are not needed in this setting.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A separate presentation showed encouraging first results from a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating venetoclax in patients with AML, justifying further investigation of this drug in AML.

Venetoclax achieved an overall response rate of 15.5%; there were 5 patients who achieved CR, 4 of whom had incomplete platelet recovery. These responses were in patients with relapsed/refractory AML or patients who received venetoclax as frontline therapy but who were unfit for intensive treatment.

“AML is an aggressive cancer with low survival rates, and there is a high need for new, effective treatment options. The results of this trial of venetoclax are encouraging and warrant additional study in patients with AML,” said Marina Y. Konopleva, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Leukemia, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Related Items
Atezolizumab, Vemurafenib, and Cobimetinib Triplet Therapy Improves PFS in BRAF-Positive Melanoma
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on August 17, 2020 in AACR Highlights
Sitravatinib, Novel TKI, plus Nivolumab Elicits Good Responses in Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Phoebe Starr
TOP - May 2020, Vol 13, No 3 published on May 21, 2020 in Emerging Therapies
First-in-Class Oral MK-6482 Shows Exciting Results in Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Phoebe Starr
TOP - May 2020, Vol 13, No 3 published on May 21, 2020 in Emerging Therapies, Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Real-World Healthcare Utilization and Costs Support Broader Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy
Phoebe Starr
TOP - March 2020, Vol 13, No 2 published on March 11, 2020 in Value-Based Care
Mosunetuzumab, a Dual-Targeted Antibody, Shows Complete Remissions in Relapsed/Refractory NHL After CAR T-Cell Therapy By
Phoebe Starr
TOP - March 2020, Vol 13, No 2 published on March 11, 2020 in ASH 2019 Highlights
Improving Access to Genetic Cancer Screening in a Medically Underserved Community
Phoebe Starr
TOP - March 2020, Vol 13, No 2 published on March 11, 2020 in ACCC
Ceritinib Effective in Treating Brain Metastases in NSCLC
Phoebe Starr
TOP - March 2020, Vol 13, No 2 published on March 11, 2020 in Lung Cancer
Targeted Therapy with Olaparib Beneficial in Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Gene Mutations
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on February 24, 2020 in ESMO
Selecting Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Multiple Choices
Meg Barbor, MPH
TOP - January 2020, Vol 13, No 1 published on January 10, 2020 in Hematologic Cancers
Osimertinib Superior TKI as First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC with EGFR Mutation
Phoebe Starr
TOP - January 2020, Vol 13, No 1 published on January 10, 2020 in Lung Cancer
Last modified: April 27, 2020