Retrospective Analysis Provides Insight into Treatment-Emergent Neutropenia Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib or Palbociclib

2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer - Breast Cancer

Real-world data showed that patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving palbociclib had a numerically higher rate of neutropenia than patients receiving ribociclib.

After the administration of CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib for hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer, neutropenia is the most common adverse event.

In patients receiving these therapies, data are lacking to compare the incidences of treatment-emergent neutropenia. Lee Schwartzberg, MD, FACP, Medical Oncologist, Breast Cancer, West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Germantown, TN, and colleagues presented real-world data exploring the incidence, duration, and severity of treatment-emergent neutropenia, based on a retrospective analysis of administrative claims and electronic health records.

Two mutually exclusive cohorts of patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with ribociclib or palbociclib. Patients were matched 1:1 based on year of treatment start and age. Previous baseline activity was required for ≥6 months.

To evaluate incidence rates of treatment-emergent neutropenia from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, in patients receiving ribociclib or palbociclib, the MarketScan claims databases were used. From the Optum deidentified Electronic Health Record Dataset, data on neutropenia severity and duration were acquired. Neutrophil counts from lab tests (grade 1/2, 1000-1500/µL; grade 3, 500-1000/µL; grade 4< 500/µL) within the first 180 days of treatment were used to grade neutropenia severity. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the duration of neutropenia, characterized as the period of time between first aberrant laboratory result and those showing resolution. One hundred fifty-two patients from the MarketScan database were included in the ribociclib and palbociclib groups after 1:1 matching, and 168 matched patients from the Optum database were also included.

In 38 (25%) patients in the palbociclib group and 25 (17%) patients in the ribociclib group, neutropenia was reported. The rate of neutropenia per person-treatment year was higher in the palbociclib group at 0.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.7) when compared with the ribociclib group at 0.4 (95% CI, 0.3-0.6).

Although statistical significance was not demonstrated due most likely to small sample size, neutropenia rate ratio between treatments (palbociclib vs ribociclib) was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8-2.3). Whereas the severity of neutropenia with palbociclib and ribociclib was similar at 32% for grade 1/2 and 4% for grade 4, it differed at grade 3, which was 35% for palbociclib and 26% for ribociclib. For grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (palbociclib vs ribociclib), the rate ratio was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-1.8). For palbociclib compared with ribociclib, the median neutropenia duration was significant, at 29 days compared with 20 days (P <.01).

Considering best possible practices for the management of neutropenia is an integral component of the treatment of hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer. Clinicians may want to consider the impact of treatment and real-world data regarding rates of neutropenia, especially a higher rate of grade 3 neutropenia and a longer duration of neutropenia in patients receiving palbociclib therapy.

Source: Schwartzberg LS, Zarate JP, Chandiwana D, et al. Real-world incidence, duration, and severity of treatment-emergent (TE) neutropenia among patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with ribociclib (RIB) or palbociclib (PAL). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl). Abstract e13048.

Related Items
Olaparib Extends Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer and BRCA Mutation
William King
TOP - November 2021 Vol 14, No 7 published on November 10, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Tucatinib plus Trastuzumab and Capecitabine Triplet Maintains Survival Benefit in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Results from HER2CLIMB Trial
Charlie Dawson
TOP - September 2021 Vol 14, No 5 published on September 7, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Cryoablation Appears Safe and Effective in Low-Risk, Early-Stage Breast Cancer
William Ackerman
TOP - July 2021 Vol 14, No 4 published on July 20, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy Improves Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic TNBC
Patricia Stewart
TOP - May 2021 Vol 14, No 3 published on May 14, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Abemaciclib plus Endocrine Therapy Offers Invasive Disease–Free Survival Benefit in Patients with High-Risk, HR-Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Patricia Stewart
TOP - May 2021 Vol 14, No 3 published on May 14, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Year in Review Introduction
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Concurrent Use of Medications with Potential Drug–Drug Interactions: Real-World Analysis of Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant Provides Statistically Significant Benefit as First- and Second-Line Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Preliminary Results from a Phase 2 Trial of Fulvestrant/Palbociclib as First-Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Endocrine-Sensitive Advanced Breast Cancer
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Ribociclib Added to Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer Demonstrated Favorable Quality-of-Life Results
2020 Year in Review - Breast Cancer published on January 24, 2021 in Breast Cancer
Last modified: July 22, 2021