Stay Up to Date
Breaking News,
Updates, & More
Click Here to

Encorafenib plus Cetuximab Improves Quality of Life versus Standard of Care in Colorectal Cancer Associated with BRAF Mutation

TOP - May 2020, Vol 13, No 3 - Colorectal Cancer

San Francisco, CA—The combination of encorafenib (Braftovi) plus cetuximab (Erbitux), with or without binimetinib (Mektovi), improved the quality of life based on patient-reported assessments better than current standard of care in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and BRAF V600E mutation, according to the BEACON CRC study, which was presented at the 2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet and the doublet regimens reduced the risk for quality-of-life deterioration by more than 40% by multiple assessment instruments compared with the control regimen, according to Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD, FACP, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. The median overall survival (OS) of the doublet was equal to that of the triplet with additional follow-up; therefore, the 2-drug combination of encorafenib plus cetuximab will be submitted to the FDA for review, said Dr Kopetz.

“On the basis of these results, the decision has been made not to submit the binimetinib [triplet] to the FDA, and the doublet of encorafenib plus cetuximab is now under review,” Dr Kopetz said.

Study Results

The BEACON CRC study was an international open-label phase 3 clinical trial of 665 patients with metastatic CRC and BRAF V600E mutation whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 previous regimens. After a safety lead-in, patients were randomized to 3 groups: the triplet targeted therapy of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab; the doublet targeted therapy of encorafenib and cetuximab; or the control group of the investigators’ choice of current standard of care with either cetuximab plus irinotecan (Onivyde) or cetuximab plus FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan).

As was published in late 2019 ­(Kopetz S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1632-1643), after a median follow-­up of 7.8 months, the median OS was 9.0 months in the triplet arm versus 5.4 months in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; P <.001). The median OS in the doublet arm was 8.4 months (HR, 0.60; P <.001).

Dr Kopetz reported updated OS results showing additional improvement in OS of 1 month—to 9.3 months—in the doublet arm, with a median OS follow-up of nearly 13 months.

“There’s no discernible difference in the survival curves,” Dr Kopetz said. “So in my practice right now, I’m using the doublet.”


The rates of adverse events, including grade 3 to 4 events and serious adverse events, were comparable across the 3 arms. The overall adverse events were 50% with the doublet, 58% with the triplet, and 61% in the control group. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the triplet arm were diarrhea (10% vs 2% in the doublet arm and 10% in the control arm), abdominal pain (6% vs 2% and 5%, respectively), and nausea (5%, <1%, and 1%).

“We recognized that safety doesn’t always capture the patient experience, and that is the rationale for incorporating quality-of-life metrics into the study. This is an important component that really helps to understand the patient experience and complements the clinical efficacy end point,” Dr Kopetz said.

Quality-of-Life Measures

Four quality-of-life measures were used, including EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-C, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC. The results were evaluated at baseline, then at day 1 of every treatment cycle, at end of treatment, and again at a 30-day follow-up safety evaluation.

The median time to deterioration in the EORTC QLQ-C30 was delayed by 45% with the triplet arm versus the control arm (4.96 months vs 2.2 months). In the doublet arm, the median time to deterioration on this same scale was 4.6 months, translating to a 46% delay in deterioration compared with controls.

In the doublet arm, the median time to deterioration on the FACT-C was 5.36 months, corresponding to a 54% reduction versus the control arm.

The median time to deterioration on the EQ-5D-5L was delayed by 51% in the doublet arm versus the controls.

At least a minimal improvement in symptoms on the PGIC was reported by 53% of the patients randomized to the triplet, 58% randomized to the doublet, and only 36% of the controls.

Cost Considerations

Commenting on this study, Christopher M. Booth, MD, FRCPC, Canada Research Chair in Population Cancer Care, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada, focused on the financial toxicity of the new regimens, noting that a 28-day supply of the doublet would cost approximately $23,000 compared with approximately $32,000 with the triplet regimen. The average treatment course would cost $109,000 and $168,000, respectively, with annual costs reaching $280,000 and $305,000.

“We have to be pragmatic about the resources we have for cancer care and think very carefully about the magnitude of benefit relative to the price, so I think I would leave the answer to a formal cost-effectiveness analysis,” said Dr Booth.

Related Items
Updated NCCN Guidelines Lower Age for Initial Colorectal Cancer Screening
William King
TOP - May 2022 Vol 15, No 3 published on May 6, 2022 in NCCN 2022 Highlights, Colorectal Cancer
Adagrasib Shows Promising Activity in Patients with KRASᴳ¹²ᶜ-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Patricia Stewart
TOP - January 2022 Vol 15, No 1 – Online Only published on January 20, 2022 in Colorectal Cancer
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab May Be a New First-Line Option for Patients with MSI-H or dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
William King
TOP - September 2020 Vol 13, No 5 published on September 14, 2020 in Colorectal Cancer
Pembrolizumab Doubles Progression-Free Survival in Subset of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Charlie Dawson
TOP - September 2020 Vol 13, No 5 published on September 14, 2020 in Colorectal Cancer
Early Detection of Cancer Feasible with Blood-Based Tests
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - July 2020, Vol 13, No 4 published on July 15, 2020 in Value-Based Care
Surgery Is a Viable Treatment Option for Patients with Early-Stage Germ Cell Tumors
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - July 2020, Vol 13, No 4 published on July 15, 2020 in Survivorship
Bispecific CAR T-Cells Show Promise in Children and Young Adults with Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - July 2020, Vol 13, No 4 published on July 15, 2020 in AACR Highlights
Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Seldom Used with Radiation in Localized Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - July 2020, Vol 13, No 4 published on July 15, 2020 in Prostate Cancer
Universal CAR T-Cells a Promising Off-the-Shelf Therapy for T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - July 2020, Vol 13, No 4 published on July 15, 2020 in Leukemia, Value-Based Care
De-escalating Chemotherapy Possible in Low-Risk Patients with Advanced Testicular Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - May 2020, Vol 13, No 3 published on May 21, 2020 in ASCO
Last modified: July 22, 2021